Make informed decisions.

5 stars based on 48 reviews

Sometimes the best choice when you come to a fork in the road is to retreat, or even merge the two forks by taking one then going off road to the other! And yet binary thinking will force us to choose between the right or left fork, even if both forks suck standing alone. Only by understanding the perils of binary thinking can you protect against its destabilizing bipolar effects in conflict resolution.

Binary logic is what makes many computer software programs run. The logic of going between "0" and "1" on streams of code is it bad when binaries are big what gives direction to hardware. Not only that, but compact discs use the same logical geography to play music.

Second, the bad and ugly. The same logic that helps us make split second decisions in dark alleys also causes disaster in conflict resolution over copyright fair use. In most but not all legal disputes I have handled, binary thinking keeps each side stuck in their black and white view of the law and facts, which means there is either fair use or there is infringement. In most cases, both sides are right, and wrong, in different respects, since there may be fair use for some parts of the medium in question -- such as a song -- whereas there may be infringement for parts -- such as the recording of the song.

As pointed out by Mr. T he same goes with decision making in conflict resolution. Take negotiations between Democrats and Republicans. Labeling an idea "Republican" or "Democrat" can change an otherwise great idea in a split second into a horrible idea, depending on the listener's prejudice. This is so even though each party may claim to have the same stated goal, such as less American unemployment.

Rather than considering the idea with is it bad when binaries are big open mind, the political listener shoves the idea into one pigeonhole or the other, even when the idea doesn't fit into either hole, and then smashes it. Alternatively, the listener blasts the idea because it doesn't fit into either hole. In so doing, yesterday's distrust taints the new today. Thus, the circle of distrust is continued, as recounted in Politics of Distrust: While binary thinking can help us survive, it can, at other times, be deadly.

Such thinking blinds us to innovative solutions available outside the binary system we desperately cling to. By considering these solutions, the two forks in the road can merge more often towards common goals, which helps opposing parties to settle cases and move on with their respective lives. E-mail The content of this field is kept private is it bad when binaries are big will not be shown publicly.

Notify me when new comments are posted. Once you hit Save, your comment will be held for moderation before being published. You will not see a confirmation message once you hit the Save button but please be assured your comment has been submitted and we will review it. What code is in the image?

Online broker banken vergleich

  • Ib broker bitcoin

    Starfishfx binary review summary

  • 99 binary option trading in nigeria

    Options world trade centre dubai

Xbmc4xbox 333 binary download

  • Learn online forex trading dubai

    Fx trader jobs melbourne

  • Ozforex login

    Professional binary options trading signals traders

  • Compte demo top option traders

    Binary option newsletter contests

Is binary options trading halal chinese new year

13 comments Wheel trade options

Learn how to trade in stocks options

Git has gained a lot of popularity in recent years as a distributed source code repository that lets users work with the full repository while in a disconnected state.

The benefits of git are well-documented, but what happens if you need to "roll back the clock" on the primary repository? Doing so is not quite so intuitive and requires elevated permissions, as you might expect for something that affects every single user of the repository.

Imagine that you commit a large file, such as a video, to your git server. In a traditional source code system, it is convenient to store everything in one place and then pull down what you need.

However, with git, the entire repository is cloned down to each user's local computer. With a large file, every single user on the project will need to download the large file s , too.

With each subsequent large file committed to the server, the problem only grows, until the repository is simply too large to be efficient for its users.

To make matters worse, even if you remove the offender from your local repository and re-commit, the file will still exist in the repository's history, which means that it will still be downloaded to everyone's local computer as part of the history. The following steps will remove the video from your branch history, but the file remains in your repo history when you clone your repo from VSTS.

Removing the files from your branch history prevents the files from being updated, which will create another version of the large file in your repo. Learn more about managing large files in Git and see this blog post for a detailed explanation and workaround for this behavior when using VSTS Git repos.

To fix this, you have to start at the source, which, in this case, is the server repository. Ask the team to stop pushing to the repository, but be aware that if additional pushes happen during this process, you will have to account for them, too, so as not to lose any data. If no one else on the team has made any changes to the repository - usually through a push - you can take the easy route, in which you essentially make your local repository look the way that you want it to i.

You may need to clone or fix your local repo before beginning this work. This could result in lost work or changes, so proceed with caution. By default, you likely only have the ability to change their local project files and repository and to push your changes to the server, so you do not have the ability to make other changes, such as deletions or rebasing, at the server level.

Therefore, you will need to either acquire project Force push preferred or admin permissions from your administrator or find someone who has them and is willing to help. For more information on git permissions, go here. This is because we need to know the most recent good commit. You get that information by opening a git command prompt and typing:. Remember that git uses pointers to determine where in the repository the head or current branch are located.

Because of this, the repository state that you are interested in will be at some point in the past. To 'go back in time' and make that prior desired state the new current state, you will need to use the git rebase command:.

The -i switch provides a little extra safety, because it will bring up the history in an editor My implementation of git on the command line in Windows brings up the classic vi editor, which you may remember if you've worked with a Unix-based system. When everything looks as you want it, in vi , type ": Now type git log again - the offending branch should be absent from the log. If it is, you are ready for the final step, which requires project admin permissions.

If you are using VSTS, you may need to set up an alternate credential that doesn't use special characters such as the " " in an email address. To do this, follow the instructions here. Now, the branch will be permanently gone from the server, and subsequent clones and syncs by project team members will not download the large files we were trying to remove. Users will need to pull down from the server in order to make sure that they are in sync with the new server repo state.

If other users have already committed to the server repository, you have an additional consideration. You want to remove the branch that contains the large file s , but you don't want to lose changes the team has made. To address this, when you open the editor as part of rebasing, look carefully at the commits. Make sure that those you want to retain are listed on the 'pick' lines; delete the ones you want to remove, such as where a large file was added.

Note that after rebasing, the other users on the team will also need to rebase so that everyone has a consistent copy of the server repository. This is a pain for everyone and normally should be avoided.

Thus, if you do need to remove a push as noted here, it is important to coordinate with the team. For full details on rebasing, take a look at the official rebasing documentation here. The key is to make sure that you know which commits are desired and undesired. In scenarios where the large file has been around for a while and there have been subsequent branches and merges, you may be able to remove the file by using the git filter-branch switch.

If you want to give this a try, follow the instructions here. Of course, it saves a lot of work to make sure that large files stay out of the main repository in the first place. With that in mind, here are some common sense best practices for the team to keep in mind:. Sometimes, undesirable elements, such as very large files, are added to a repository and need to be removed in order to keep the repository clean and lightweight.

You can do this by getting your local repository in order using the git rebase command, then using the git push --force command to overwrite the server repository with your local repository.

You bear the risk of using it. This document does not provide you with any legal rights to any intellectual property in any Microsoft product. You may copy and use this document for your internal, reference purposes.

Our new feedback system is built on GitHub Issues. For more information on this change, please read our blog post. So how can you roll back the central repository safely?

Problem Scenario Imagine that you commit a large file, such as a video, to your git server. Adding large file to the local repository After committing from the local repository, the server will also have the large file Freeze the repo Important The following steps will remove the video from your branch history, but the file remains in your repo history when you clone your repo from VSTS.

What type of feedback would you like to provide? Give product feedback Sign in to give documentation feedback Give documentation feedback Our new feedback system is built on GitHub Issues.