US Equity High Frequency Trading: Strategies, Sizing and Market Structure
4 stars based on
High-frequency equity trading is the lovechild of 12 years of SEC rulemaking and advances in trading technology. The combination of these two trends has been necessary and sufficient to unleash an array of new trading strategies. The continued success of these strategies has exchanges and ECNs, brokers and clearinghouses, market data providers and technology vendors launching new business models and offerings to support high-frequency traders or help others adapt to this new environment.
But, not everyone has a full understanding of US equity market structure, and those that do not necessarily have consistently favorable views of it. In fact, recent events have triggered politicians, the media and even the general public to weigh in on this, using such industry jargon as high frequency trading HFTflash orders, naked access and dark pools in their everyday lexicon when taking a position on the fairness of securities trading today.
However, while these terms reflect some of the newest changes in the marketplace, their direct association with each other should not be assumed without further clarification. How much daily trading activity can be classified as high frequency?
What comprises this classification? For everything that is not considered high frequency, what portion of activity is affected by it, in terms of related prices and liquidity? What kind of firms include high frequency trading as part of their strategy and how big of a role does it play in the profitability of the industry? Should we expect all participants to play on a level field or will professional traders naturally gain greater ability from their experience, intuitive knowledge and advanced technology tools?
What is the relationship between these terms? Once we peel back the layers of the process and examine the tradeoffs that everyone faces, from institutional investors and hedge funds, to retail brokers, individuals and their representatives, the world becomes a series of tradeoffs: High-frequency trading is not a homogenous group; it is not an investment style; it is not a unique phenomenon to equity markets or the US.
High-frequency trading merely describes one characteristic of a wide array of market participants. The industry and its regulators must stop looking at participants and start looking at specific mechanisms and practices. The TABB Group study on US Equity High Frequency Trading is a 32 page report that explores the importance of high frequency trading in our market, defines terms associated with high frequency trading, and explains the relationships among the primary participants.
It gives explanations and examples of high-frequency trading strategies, including virtual market making, rebate trading, liquidity detection, and various forms of arbitrage. Included throughout the report are the results of a recent poll of 62 market participants on various components of current market structure such as flash trading, redefining front running, the tradeoff between order exposure and price improvement, and the need for an SEC inquiry into market structure, ability to get a good execution.
Skip to main content. Strategies, Sizing and Market Structure. Executive Summary High-frequency equity trading is the lovechild of 12 years of SEC rulemaking and advances in trading technology. Areas of Interest Equities.
You are not logged in for access or purchasing of products. A Cautious Work in Progress. High Frequency for Long Only. More from the Author s. US Institutional Equity Trading Bellwethers of the Buy Side. Transforming Data into Intelligence.
More by Adam Sussman. More by Larry Tabb. More by Robert Iati.